Wednesday, July 18, 2007

REHMAN RASHID: Salute to a failed venture in waste disposal

NST Online » Columns, http://www.nst.com.my/Current_News/NST/Tuesday/Columns/20070717093502/Article/index_html
2007/07/17
REHMAN RASHID: Salute to a failed venture in waste disposal
By : REHMAN RASHID

THE final a-Broga-tion of the RM1.5 billion incinerator project evoked in me mixed feelings of relief and regret.

Regret, because I’d met some of the technology’s developers, having visited Japan in 2003 on a fact-finding tour of their operations. I am sorry that my Japanese acquaintances had to spend five years of their lives and careers in the limbo of this project, only to wind up having to pack up from their KL condos, get their kids out of international school and go home with nothing sold, nothing built, nothing done. This won’t look good on their resumès.

Relief, because having seen how well this technology served its purpose in Japan, I deeply doubted it could work here. The Ebara Corporation of Japan had offered Malaysia incinerator technology that was all about phase transitions. Operating at higher temperatures than other systems, the process melts solids into liquids, vaporises liquids into gas, then breaks down gasses to reduce emissions to a tenth or less of World Health Organisation standards.

What ash remains is itself melted into an inert slag that can be turned into paving bricks and road surfacing. They were thinking up new uses for it all the time.

The Japanese were rightly proud of their technology. Their plants were spotless; their floors polished to the semblance of still waters. They were run like supertankers: totally computerised and automated; operated by about 20 technicians in glass-walled control rooms.
Apart from the receiving bays and conveyor belts where the garbage was sorted on its way to fiery oblivion, all spaces occupied by humans were hermetically sealed, smelling of naught but a muted hint of air freshener. Yet, the entire process from silo to smokestack was visible on banks of plasma-screen CCTV monitors. There were even cameras trained on the top of the chimney, or "flue exhaust", out of which there appeared nothing at all; not even a heat shimmer.

Sato-san, my corporate guide (not his real name, of course, he has enough troubles as it is) told me sticking one’s head down that pipe would be less harmful than smoking a cigarette. (He later provided data to back up that assertion, along with the WHO factoid cited above.)

But this did not accord with the anxieties of the people of Broga, Semenyih, Selangor, who feared a cancer factory on their doorstep; a monstrous polluter outrageously posing as a pollution solution. Their campaign made graphic use of Industrial Revolution imagery: Black clouds billowing from a 19th-century factory chimney.

Sato-san was deeply hurt by this. His company’s plants, though not exactly inconspicuous, were physically no more obtrusive than modest shopping malls, to which he’d noticed scant aversion among Malaysians. In some parts of Japan, they were shopping malls. There was one model project where a revolving restaurant had been built halfway up the incinerator flue.

The safety of these facilities and the innocuousness of their emissions was clear for everyone to see. After all, said Sato-san, resting his case, weren’t the Japanese the longest-lived people in the world, with the lowest incidence of cancer and heart disease?

Ruefully, I had to tell him that, despite the best efforts of certain former administrations, Malaysians had not demonstrated much of an aptitude for turning Japanese. For instance, see how Japanese households so neatly separate their rubbish into colour-coded bags of glass, plastic, paper and organic waste.

See how garbage trucks are really vans, compact enough to scuttle about the narrow warrens of Japan’s neighbourhoods, serving communities and not conurbations. See how waste incinerators snuggle up to municipalities, located conveniently enough for people to drop off their rubbish themselves.

This was why the incinerator had been originally slated for Puchong, smack-dab in the middle of the Klang Valley’s industrial suburbia. The system was designed to operate in intimate symbiosis with trashmakers.

But though "small is beautiful" in Japan, Malaysia had been raised to think mega. The plant was to be four times bigger than anything Ebara had built before. The people of Puchong had protested mightily, and the project had been relocated out of town to the rural enclave of Broga, whose people had also protested mightily.

In the end, after years of trouble and expense for the project contractors, maintaining offices and staff here, diverting resources from other projects, and suffering terrible public relations, the Malaysian government axed the project on the basis of unacceptable cost.

This was the right call. For the 1,500 tonnes of garbage a day the plant was to have processed, 1,000 lorries a day would have had to lumber and splatter to and fro, wrecking existing roads and requiring new ones. While the plant itself could be run by a couple of dozen technicians, a small army of manual workers would have been needed to sort the rubbish Malaysian households will probably never bother sorting themselves.

And the protests. And the lawsuits. And the political fallout: manna from heaven for the opposition; flaming meteorites for the government.

Sayonara, Sato-san. It’s not that your technology is not fit for this country; this country is not fit for it. We’ll have to find other ways to avoid living amid mountains of garbage with lakeside views of cesspits. Our most promising innovation in waste management so far: The Klang municipality’s offer of 10 sen per kilo for rubbish, encouraging the theft of garbage instead of scrap metal.

Thursday, July 12, 2007

旺姐:撤焚化炉彰显人民力量学运:不透明情况下展开结束

http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/69710
旺姐:撤焚化炉彰显人民力量学运:不透明情况下展开结束 07年7月10日 中午12:20
人民公正党主席旺阿兹莎发表文告表示,政府应认真从武来岸焚化炉计划取消事件中吸取教训,即真理最终将会在人民抗争中获得伸张,以及“人民是老板”,以免在未来重蹈覆辙,作出为民众带来不便和浪费公共资源的计划决定。 “我们需从武来岸居民伸张正义中学到两个教训。第一个教训是,无论花费多长的时间,当人民站出来要纠正错误时,正义最终都会获得伸张。” “政府须吸取的第二个教训则是,无论他们欲实行现有的计划,或在未来推介新的计划,人民才是老板。” 她指出,政府如果早在计划开始时就吸取了第二个教训,武来岸居民就无需因为有关计划,而面对巨大压力以及无法安睡。此外,公共资源也不会因为误导人民相信该计划是安全的讯息而被浪费,政府也无须为有关计划的取消而做出赔偿。 政府应允许人民参与决策过程 旺阿兹莎(左图)强调,由于人民对他们所居住的周遭环境拥有更深的认识,因此政府应该咨询他们,并允许他们参与决策过程。她也表示,政府往往忘记了人民只赋予他们权力来做任何有利于人民的决定,而非不利于人民的决定。 “上周五,我曾在垃圾管理法令辩论时,要求房屋及地方政府部澄清是否打算以两个位于半岛不同州属的小型焚化炉,来代替这项已被取消的焚化炉计划。” 她同时也呼吁该部公布是否曾在计划取消后,赔偿负责有关计划的发展上荏原公司(Ebara Corporation),以及赔偿的数额。 纳吉:因成本和维修费昂贵取消 这项耗资15亿令吉的本区域最大型焚化炉计划是于2003年首次被马哈迪政府提出。它原本打算建造在雪州的蒲种,但是在当地居民激烈反对下,最终选择了武来岸作为新的兴建地点。然而,有关的计划仍一直受到武来岸居民,包括非政府组织和在野党的大力反对。 在2006年8月15日,新加坡《商业时报》率先报道,大马政府已经通知武来岸焚化炉计划发展商即日本的荏原公司和本地的Harta Summa私人有限公司,有关的计划已经被中止。但是,政府依然对守口如瓶,拒绝证实该计划是否已被腰斩。 不过,武来岸居民已在上周四接获代表政府的高级联邦律师发函,证实腰斩焚化炉计划,而针对有关计划的所进行的4年抗争也终于宣布胜利。 副首相纳吉在上周六透露,政府是基于昂贵的建筑成本和维修费,而决定取消焚化炉计划。他也澄清政府不是因为武来岸居民的诉讼案而停止该计划。 据《东方日报》报道,纳吉也在周日指出,只要成本低和拥有适当的科技,政府在未来可能会在雪兰莪州建立一个焚化炉。
纳吉指因成本和维修费贵取消
学运促政府应公开焚化炉合约

Broga incinerator project called off

Friday July 6, 2007
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2007/7/6/nation/20070706172529&sec=nation

Broga incinerator project called off
By LOONG MENG YEE and ROYCE CHEAH
SHAH ALAM: The RM1.5bil incinerator project in Broga has been terminated.
Court of Appeal judge Justice Suriyadi Halim Omar, who was sitting as a High Court judge, was informed of the matter by counsel Uma Parvathy Thothathri when the court commenced Friday for the continued hearing of an action taken by a group of Broga residents to block the project.
About 30 residents present in court cheered and applauded in court when lawyers acting for the Government confirmed that the project would no longer proceed.
Uma was acting for the residents who took the Government to court in 2003 over the project.
Friday's was supposed to have been a continuation of the hearings for the case but in a surprising turn of events, Uma informed Suriyadi that the firm had received a letter from the Attorney-General’s Chambers on Thursday evening.
Uma then told the court the letter stated the project had been “ditamatkan” (terminated).
Justice Suriyadi then turned to the two counsel representing the Government and inquired why the project was terminated.
Senior Federal Counsel Suzana Atan and Selangor legal adviser Datuk Zawyah Be Loth Khan replied that the project had indeed been called off.
The court also decided that the Government would pay costs to the plaintiff’s solicitors.
Outside the court, Alice Lee, who led the action and whose name appeared as the plaintiff in the suit, said the 402 residents who sought justice in court were “so very happy”.
“We are meeting tonight to plan for a celebration. We want to invite all those who had helped us in this struggle. Particularly, we want to record our appreciation to Judge Suriyadi. He has been very fair to both sides and he made sure the lawyers did their job on time,” said Lee.
On Nov 8, 2003, Lee filed a suit seeking a declaration ordering the Government to divulge details of the controversial RM1.5bil municipal solid waste thermal treatment plant.
On Jan 20, 2005, Lee filed an application on behalf of the villagers for a stay order pending the outcome of the suit against the Selangor Menteri Besar, the Science, Technology and Environment Ministry and the Selangor Land and Mines Department director.
On Feb 14 that same year, the High Court granted the temporary stay order.
Outside the courtroom, Uma said she would not withdraw the suit in the event the Government decided to revive project in the future.
"If the Government does, that would tantamount to contempt of court," she said.
Broga no-incinerator committee chairman Zulkefly Mohamad Omar said the residents were very happy that the matter has finally been put to rest and thanked the court.
"This issue involves public and not political interest," he said.
Selangor state executive councillor in charge of environment Datuk Ch’ng Toh Eng said there had not been any official statement from the Federal Government to the state regarding the cancellation of the incinerator project.

Broga incinerator project called off

Saturday July 7, 2007
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2007/7/7/nation/18238161&sec=nation

Broga incinerator project called off
By LOONG MENG YEE and ROYCE CHEAH
PUTRAJAYA: The RM1.5bil incinerator project in Broga has been cancelled.
Court of Appeal Justice Suriyadi Halim Omar, who was sitting as a High Court judge, was informed of the matter by counsel Uma Parvathy Thothathri when the court commenced yesterday for the continued hearing of an action taken by a group of Broga residents to block the project.
About 30 residents present in court cheered and applauded when lawyers acting for the Government confirmed that the project would no longer proceed.
Uma was acting for the residents, who took the Government to court in 2003 over the project.
Yesterday was supposed to be a continuation of the hearing for the case, but in a surprising turn of events Uma informed Justice Suriyadi that the firm had received a letter from the Attorney-General’s Chambers on Thursday evening.
Uma told the court the letter stated that the project had been “ditamatkan” (cancelled).
Justice Suriyadi then turned to the two counsels representing the Government and asked why the project was cancelled.
Senior Federal Counsel Suzana Atan and Selangor legal adviser Datuk Zawyah Be Loth Khan replied that the project had indeed been called off.
Justice Suriyadi later asked again: “Are you all sure? Do not say the project is terminated, then later have the project revived. Why was the project terminated?”
Suzana said she did not know why the project was called off and that she was only informed by the ministry concerned.
The judge then jokingly asked her, “Is it a state secret?” and laughed. The Government’s counsel could not respond to his question.
Uma then informed the court that due to the turn of events the plaintiff would opt to file a notice of discontinuance within seven days.
The court also decided that the Government would pay costs to the plaintiff’s solicitors.
Outside the court, Alice Lee, who led the action and whose name appeared as the plaintiff in the suit, said the 402 residents who sought justice in court were “so very happy”.

DPM: Broga incinerator project stopped because it was too expensive

Saturday July 7, 2007
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2007/7/7/nation/20070707141216&sec=nation

DPM: Broga incinerator project stopped because it was too expensive
TANGKAK: The Government had decided to cancel the RM1.5bil incinerator project in Broga last year as it was very costly to build and to maintain.
Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdul Najib Tun Razak said the decision last year was made at a meeting he chaired with the Housing and Local Government Minister Datuk Seri Ong Ka Ting.
Speaking to the reporters here he said the decision was not due to any protest or court action but due to the high capital cost and keeping fee to have such incinerator.
"The studies showed that the Broga incinerator system, which cost more than RM1.5bil, is very expensive.
He was speaking after launching a unity carnival organised by Pertubuhan Kebajikan Dan Dakwah Islamiah Johor or Pekida.
Abdul Najib said the Government had several alternatives, including using the sanitary landfill system in Bukit Tagar, to resolve waste disposal problems in the country.
He said the landfill system had been running without any problem and the Government would also look into other systems, which were more cost-effective and with proven technology.
He said besides cost-effective and proven technology, whatever project the Government planned to undertake should also ensure the safety of the people and the environment.
He said many developed nations used incinerators but taxes in those countries were also very high, adding that, Malaysia could not adopt their ways as it would burden the people. Abdul Najib also hoped for Indonesia to ask for assistance from Malaysia to help in battling the haze, which had started to hit the region now. He said Malaysia could even deploy some Royal Air Force planes to carry out cloud seeding over the region as the sources of the haze had been identified. "We are willing to help Indonesia in battling the haze problem," he added.

Broga project too costly, says Najib

Sunday July 8, 2007
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2007/7/8/nation/18246320&sec=nation

Broga project too costly, says Najib
TANGKAK: The Government decided to cancel the RM1.5bil incinerator project in Broga last year as it was very costly to build and maintain.
Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdul Najib Tun Razak said the decision was made during a meeting with Housing and Local Government Minister Datuk Seri Ong Ka Ting last year.
The decision was made at the Cabinet Committee meeting on solid wastes and was subsequently approved by the Cabinet.
Speaking to reporters here, Najib said the decision was not due to any protest or court action but the high capital and maintenance costs to have such an incinerator.
“Studies showed that the Broga incinerator system, which would cost more than RM1.5bil, was very expensive.
“It is also very expensive to maintain. No district council or municipality would be able to afford it,” he said after launching a unity carnival organised by Pertubuhan Kebajikan Dan Dakwah Islamiah Johor.
Najib said the Government had several alternatives, including using the sanitary landfill system in Bukit Tagar, to resolve waste disposal problems in the country.
To a question, Najib said an incinerator was something that Malaysia could use to dispose of its waste but the project should be affordable.
He said many developed nations used incinerators but taxes in those countries were also very high.
Najib also hoped that Indonesia would seek Malaysia's help in battling the haze, which was starting to affect the region now.
He said Malaysia could even deploy some Royal Malaysian Air Force planes to carry out cloud seeding over the region as the sources of the haze had been identified.
“We are willing to help Indonesia in battling the haze problem,” he added.