Thursday, May 25, 2006

Broga residents clear second hurdle in court


reelpower

http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/51542

Broga residents clear second hurdle in court
Claudia Theophilus
May 25, 06 2:33pm


Alice Lee was declared by the Shah Alam High Court late yesterday as
the legitimate representative of Kampung Broga residents in a suit to
stop a RM1.5 billion mammoth incinerator project nearby.

The Attorney-General's Chambers and the Selangor state legal advisor
had contended that she did not have any legal standing in the main
suit filed on Nov 8, 2003, seeking a court declaration for full
disclosure of the project details which has so far remained opaque.

Justice Suriadi Halim Omar, in granting the order in terms, offered a
polite yet firm rebuke of both government lawyers present for failing
to reply the plaintiff's affidavits.

"As far as today's matter is concerned, I follow the law and not based
on my own whims and fancy. I have to grant the order in terms. I'm
going to give the order because you didn't reply," he said to a
courtroom packed with Broga villagers.

Special Branch personnel also sat in court throughout the day although
the Broga matter was only heard for 40 minutes until 5.10pm.

State legal advisor Badariah Hassan and senior federal counsel Suzana
Atan appeared for Selangor Land and Minerals Department director and
the Science, Technology and Environment Ministry director-general
respectively.

Earlier, the residents' lawyer T Uma Parvathy said both parties have
yet to respond to the plaintiff's affidavit which was filed seven
months ago.

This kept Suriadi on their backs asking for reasons why they had not
bothered to reply.

"Why reply some (affidavits) and not the rest? Why didn't you reply?
You must be all-enveloping in your response to the affidavits.

Chose to ignore

Badariah replied that they didn't want to reply because they were
waiting for the outcome of an appeal both had filed that morning
against the deputy registrar's decision on March 24 to dismiss an
earlier application to strike out the main suit.

"But you lost. If there was no case, the matter would have been struck
off," said Suriadi.

"An appeal does not act as a stay, the law is very clear on this."

He chided them for ignoring the affidavits.

"You have to reply all the affidavits, you have to act. You can't just
sit there and do nothing. You can't ignore the plaintiff's affidavits.
What is strange here is that both of you decided not to act."

At this juncture, Suzana argued that additional supporting documents
to prove Lee's legal standing were only filed "as an afterthought to
circumvent our appeal".

Suriadi: Yes, we all see this. We're all professionals here. Now,
we're hearing by affidavit and you have failed to reply, and this
could be deemed as an admission.

Suzana: We cannot reply because we're not a legal entity.

Suriadi: No, you can't say that. Why didn't you react to it
(affidavits). You must be sensitive to every application. You must
understand (this), you are a professional.

Before standing down the Broga case earlier in the day, the judge had
remarked that he may not appear stern or angry but that did not mean
he will not show his dissatisfaction or anger.

Approached later, Suzana said they chose not to reply because it was a
tactic by the plaintiff to circumvent their appeal.

Zarina Begum held a watching brief for the Bar Council.

Controversy-ridden

The federal government project for a 1,500-tonne capacity plant has
drawn international criticism from zero waste management lobbyists and
anti-incinerator scientists who cite potential hazards of toxic
emissions, and economic and environmental problems.

On Feb 14 last year, Broga residents won temporary reprieve when the
court granted an interim stay order on all project work pending the
disposal of a main suit.

However, the interim stay did nothing to stop the Selangor government
from acquiring land from 52 Broga residents to build access roads and
as part of the incinerator plant's perimeter compound.

The government's lack of transparency in this case has prompted
numerous local protests.

The plant, first proposed in 1997, is touted as the biggest of its
kind in the world using Japan's fluidised-bed gasification and
ash-melting technology.

Residents surrounding Broga and in Semenyih have maintained over the
last four years insisted that the plan sits in a water catchment area
where a dam is located, their strongest ground yet.

A global movement is also underway to replace incinerator technology
with green solutions such as recycling and zero waste management which
has a proven record in many rich and poor countries.

In late March 2003, malaysiakini exclusively reported that Japanese
engineering giant Ebara Corp had won the multi-billion ringgit job the
previous month to design, build and commission the plant.

In another exclusive, malaysiakini reported that it was in trouble
with the Malaysian government for allegedly failing to fulfill its
contractual obligations by not detailing its technology transfer plan.

Despite reported problems between the contractor and the project
proponent, the Housing and Local Government Ministry, the status of
the project is unclear because government officials including minister
Ong Ka Ting remain persistently evasive when approached for comments.

Hearing of an application for a fresh stay order pending disposal of
the main suit will continue on July 11.
Send your comments on the above issue to us at
voxpopuli@malaysiakini.com. Your email may be published in
Malaysiakini. Please keep your comments brief, and do let us know if
you wish to remain anonymous.

Saturday, May 20, 2006

Fix Problem at the root

reelpower

NST Letter
Fix problem at the root
11 May 2006
ZURINA ISMAIL, Kuala Lumpur

I HOPE that in the haste to rectify the leakage of leachate from landfills, the Government does not rush into building the RM1.5 billion mega incinerator at Broga. It must first consider the possible consequences.

Incinerators for waste disposal have been reported to release dioxins, an extremely hazardous class of chemicals that can cause anything from cancer to reproductive and neurological disorders, birth defects, kidney damage, to heart and lung diseases in humans.

Residents in Broga, Kajang and Semenyih also include students from schools and a university. These young people are our future.

We should take every precaution to ensure their health and safety.

I am disappointed that recycling campaigns do not include adequate facilities and incentives for the campaign to be effective.

A significant point to note is the absence of recycling bins in most, if not all, residential areas and schools.

One cannot expect individuals to go for recycling if the facilities are not readily and visibly available.

I live in a middle-class residential estate and have yet to see recycling bins here.

I separate my garbage and dispose of it at the nearest recycling bin at a shopping mall, paying RM1 to get there.

Given the effort involved, very few people are likely to take the trouble to recycle their waste.

What we need is more bins for garbage separation if waste prevention and reduction are to be carried out at source.

Since much time and money has been spent on creating an awareness of recycling, why not spend a little more on providing the facilities to enable us to actually do it?

A simple calculation shows that if a family with three or four children practice waste separation, the habit would be inculcated in three or four more families by the next generation.

This could mean a significant amount of waste reduction by then. It is, without a doubt, a sustainable solution to an ongoing problem.

Spending millions on rehabilitating problem landfills will not amount to much if a mega incinerator that costs millions is then built, only to be the source of a much bigger problem in the future.

No amount of high-tech solutions is going to solve a problem if the problem is not first addressed at the root.

Friday, May 05, 2006

Huge M'sian waste project runs into hurdle

reelpower

http://business-times.asia1.com.sg/sub/news/story/0,4574,194207,00.html?

Published May 4, 2006

Huge M'sian waste project runs into hurdle
Govt to review RM1.5b incinerator in Selangor


By S JAYASANKARAN
IN KUALA LUMPUR

Email this article
Print article
Feedback

THE construction of the region's biggest waste incinerator, to be located in the rural hamlet of Broga in central Selangor state, has run into some hiccups.


According to several businessmen familiar with the project, the technical committee of Malaysia's Ministry of Local Government and Housing has decided on a second look at the project, raising concerns among those involved that the RM1.52 billion (S$663 million) project could be scaled down or even scrapped.

It isn't clear why the review is being considered but the businessmen said that it could involve the growing anxiety in government over the environmental side effects of waste disposal projects.

On April 28, for example, Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak announced that 16 open landfills situated near water intake points in Peninsular Malaysia would be closed with immediate effect.

This followed allegations that discharge from an open landfill had led to high ammonia levels in the Selangor River resulting in some residents receiving foul smelling water through their taps.

The re-think on waste disposal projects underscores what has long been perceived as a problem with the government - a tendency to react to events rather than to think through and address long-term solutions to obvious problems.





The issue of landfills, said the businessmen, had been pointed out to government as far back as six years ago but nothing was done. Similarly, an idea to mandate recycling as a means to tackle waste generation has been sitting on the statute books for over 10 years, the businessmen said.

For its part, the incinerator project has been engulfed in controversy from the word go. That it's necessary cannot be denied: Kuala Lumpur produces 2,700 tonnes of waste a day which is more than its disposal sites can handle.

Unfortunately, the scale of the incinerator project - it can burn 1,500 tonnes a day - almost inevitably guaranteed that no neighbourhood wanted it in their backyards for environmental reasons. The incinerator would have been one of the largest of its kind in the world, capable of burning six times more waste than current facilities.

Indeed, the first place selected for the project was Puchong, a working class industrial township southwest of Kuala Lumpur. Its residents raised such a howl that Ong Ka Ting, the then minister of housing and local government, beat a hasty retreat.

Broga, a rural outpost to the south of KL, was Mr Ong's next choice but even its residents attempted to stop the project by way of a court injunction. The injunction has since been set aside and the project was awarded to a consortium led by Japanese company Ebara together with Harta Suma, a private Malaysian construction company.

Even so, it isn't clear if the project can be scrapped without the government having to pay hefty sums in compensation to the consortium. Businessmen noted that government had to fork out RM100 million to the developer of the stalled bridge project to replace the causeway linking Singapore.